Recent news has shown that the majority
of studies geared towards cancer research are inaccurate and likely
fraudulent by nature. Findings published in the journal Nature show
that 88% of major studies on cancer that have been published in
reputable journals over the years can not be reproduced to show their
accuracy. This means that the research findings published are not based
on accurate results.
Author of the review and former head of
cancer research at Amgen C. Glenn Begley was unable to replicate the
results of 47 of the 53 studies he examined. This suggests that
researchers are fabricating their findings simply to create the illusion
of positive findings instead of publishing their actual results. This
ensures the continuation of their steady stream of funding and grants.
Begley stated: “These are the
studies the pharmaceutical industry relies on to identify new targets
for drug development, but if you’re going to place a $1 million or $2
million or $5 million bet on an observation, you need to be sure it’s
true. As we tried to reproduce these papers we became convinced you
can’t take anything at face value.”
Although Begley was unable to publish the names of those who published the false findings, this recent development shows that the vast majority or modern cancer treatment approaches are invalid given they have been built off of a poor base.
Although Begley was unable to publish the names of those who published the false findings, this recent development shows that the vast majority or modern cancer treatment approaches are invalid given they have been built off of a poor base.
The University of Michigan’s
Comprehensive Cancer Center published an analysis in 2009, that revealed
popular cancer studies to be false. Unsurprisingly the primary cause of
fabricated results was determined to be conflicts of interest that
created results that work out best for drug companies rather than for
the people.
Personally I have always felt the cancer
industry to be transparent when it came to their research and
treatments. In many ways it is common sense. If someone said to you
“This body is sick and we need to some how make it better.” Would you
think to completely poison and destroy every healthy cell in it in order
to make it better? While it can show results in minimal cases, it isn’t
the most ideal approach. We are using highly carcinogenic treatments to
cure a disease that is created through carcinogens.
The very fact that incredible amounts of
money have been funneled into cancer research by people over the years
and yet no cure has been found should be a tell tale sign things aren’t
what they seem. This reveals in itself that the money is not going where
we might think it is and there is not a complete effort to find a cure.
While many people are aware of this and more are continuing to learn
about it, the vast majority of us continue to believe in what we are
told from government, education and the media about their findings that
have been proven false time and time again.
SOURCES:
University of Michigan report - http://www.uofmhealth.org/news/1147cancer-studies-report-conflict-of-interest
Yahoo Cancer Article: http://news.yahoo.com/cancer-science-many-discoveries-dont-hold-174216262.html
